and I have posted about her goofball of an attorney, Randall Turner, who "represented" Steven Woods. http://workingtohelpanimalstodaytomorrow.blogspot.com/2011/05/crazy-bat-lady-strikes-out.html Woods claimed to have been a war veteran who needed a pit bull as his service dog. Well, his "service" dog was involved in an attack on a person but Turner got the dog back for Woods anyway. Woods turned out to be a liar, was never in the war, wasn't even in the military. Then a couple of weeks ago, the same dog that Turner got back for Woods was involved in another attack. This time it was a couple and their young son plus the wife was pregnant. Thanks to Turner this couple came close to losing their lives as well as their young child being attacked. http://cravendesires.blogspot.com/2010/12/pit-grifters-put-nigerians-to-shame.html
So Turner is at it again. Seems he had Mary Cummins, who is being sued by Lollar, in court last week, and tried to pull a fast one. He asked Cummins if she had ever handled bats without gloves. Cummins replied that she had not except when told to do so by Amanda Lollar. Cummins is a well known and respected wildlife rescuer in LA and handles bats regularly.
Here is a tidbit of Turner's attempt to discredit Cummins.
August 27, 2011: I was deposed on Thursday for this case. I won't get into all of it but I will mention one question which summarizes this entire lawsuit. I was asked if I've ever handled bats without gloves. I said I'd only done that at Bat World. Turner then showed me a photo of someone holding a bat without gloves. The photo was in my blog and FB page. I was asked if this was a photo of me holding a bat without gloves. Turner thought he'd caught me in a lie. I'm positive Lollar knew this was not my hand holding a bat. Turner just believed her without thinking and probably not even looking. Below is the photo in question.
Here is a photo of my right hand and the right hand of the person holding that bat. That is CLEARLY not my hand. The photo of my right hand is on my blog, Flickr and FB pages. Turner just believed what Lollar told him without looking at the evidence and thinking. He filed a lawsuit stating I had no permission to take the photos when I did. The suit also stated that I posted all the videos, photos after I left when the time/date stamp on the plaintiff's own evidence clearly shows it was before I left. This summarizes the entire lawsuit. Turner filed this suit without asking for or looking at any evidence. He just blindly believed the client. (Just like he did with Woods to his later embarrassment.)
|The hand on the right is Cummins' hand. Big difference, huh?|
Clearly Randy Turner is an attorney to avoid unless you are a lying sneak or an animal abuser.