WHERE IN THE WORLD IS GALUNKER?

Fanfare, trumpets, red carpet, Pulitzer prize were the dreams of the washed out author turned pit nutter, Douglas Anthony Cooper for his book, Galunker.

So what has happened? He only needed $27,000 and collected over $62,000, still no book?
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/590151478/galunker/posts/1067162

The only explanation offered is "We're sorry to say that it does look as if the book will be a bit late, ". A bit late? Looks like to me that he's taking his time up responding to all the criticism. "We received all sorts of responses from Team Galunker during and after the launch of the Kickstarter campaign, and we’ve been incorporating your ideas and addressing your criticism." We know pit nutters only have one idea so that can't be the reason, their idea is 'education'. Too bad nutters don't have one, especially when they continue to use 'bread' for 'breed'. Then again, Cooper doesn't want the educational level too high, he would have no readers.

This fool thinks he is writing a book to help children from being mauled to death by the world's number one canine killer, the pit bull. Has he lost his mind completely, or did he ever have one to being with? ""another major goal with this book is to provide parents with a guide to how to keep their children safe around dogs. (ANY dog – breed is irrelevant.)""

Strange that Cooper is such good buddies with Nathie Winograd, who owns his own publishing house, and the book hasn't been published yet. Nathie couldn't get a reputable publishing house to touch his biased bullshit either, so he had to do it himself. What's the matter, Nathie, don't want your buddy to compete with you? C'mon publish the book for Dumb Ass. 

And Shades of Karen Delise, the excuse is that war broke out in Israel and that makes the book late. Just when you thought you had heard them all.  

THE INTERVIEW WITH THE COWARD HIDING IN HONDURAS VIA DUMB ASS COOPER

That vile little man and his puppet are at it again. Sock puppet, Douglas Anthony Cooper, ended up with an 'interview' as if that makes his fiction writing credible.

Cooper, where did you go to the school of politics - Canada? You write a piece about legislation in Virginia with the headlines that this bill will "Stop It (PeTA) From Slaughtering More Pets". That made for a good laugh. Did you even read the bill before you wrote about, have you read it since you wrote about it?

These No Kill Fools are already posting this initiative as a victory, but the reality is that PeTA never claimed to be a shelter to begin with. That's the catch. This is in their favor. Since they will no longer be considered a shelter, then they won't have to report their numbers to the State. Is that the victory you wanted Whino? Of course you have to come riding in on your white horse after the fact trying to claim credit. Typical.

And bringing up the rear, appropriate observation I think, is that Dumb Ass Cooper, trying to scoop up the crumbs of Winograd's cookies. His 'interview' was really a hoot to read and I would like to point out the more laughable areas.

First of all, this woman is the lowest of the low because she waited 15 years to report this alleged cruelty she supposedly witnessed. I mean, c'mon, give me a break. Cooper calls her "an exceptionally brave woman" and I call her a coward. 

Winograd has always made claims of him seeing cruelty in shelters, he makes pictures (supposedly) of it. BUT he fails to report it at the time to make it stop. He walks away from that cruelty and takes about it later. He did nothing to stop it, no reporting of it, nothing. He blogs about it but when called on the carpet about why he failed to report it at the time, he has no answer. Coward. If you see cruelty and walk away like that, Winograd, it makes you more guilty of the cruelty than the perpetrator, just like this woman. 

Cooper notes the statute of limitations, very important here. Fifteen years, too late to call witnesses to dispute these accusations, too late to obtain proof, and Cooper knows that. I dare say there would be no interview if this happened last week when witnesses could be had and proof given to dispute what this coward has to say.

I will venture to say that this coward is eat up with guilt because she probably did the very things she is accusing others of doing. I would like to say that but personally, this is a set up. Winograd has pulled this tactic before, more than once. Suddenly these people just show up out of the blue at the last moment with exactly what Winograd needs to overcome objections. The fact that it was so long ago prevents rebuttal. 

Winograd is hoping to prove the accusations against PeTA and the Maya story with this coward's blog. I will guarantee you that when that story of Maya ends, Nathan Winograd and his crowd will be at the root, a set up. I firmly believe they had something to do with it.

This is what the Attorney General of Virginia had to say about the situation. It plainly shows how badly Cooper and the Whino distort the truth. 

"Commonwealths Attorneys cannot always make popular decisions, rather they are charged with making responsible decisions. Prosecutors must decide if evidence gathered provides proof beyond a reasonable doubt each element of the criminal offense. The criminal intent required to convict someone for theft or property (or dog) it must be shown that the defendant intended to steal the property (or dog) it must be shown that the taking was coupled with the intent of depriving the rightful owner of their property. 

The facts appear be that PETA was asked to help when an adjacent landowner reported that they should see how his cow with her udders ripped up from abandoned and stray dogs in the trailer park area amounted to a menace not to be tolerated. He complained to PETA that the abandoned and stray dogs attacked his livestock, injured his milking cow, killed his goat and terrorized his rabbits.

 Abandoned and/or stray dogs and cats have appeared to have been considerable in what is known as Dreamland 2. PETA responded and the trailer park management encouraged their efforts in an attempt to gather stray/abandoned cats and dogs. Additionally the leases provided that no dogs were allowed to run free in the trailer park.

Approximately three weeks before Mr. Cerates dog was taken by the women associated with PETA, Mr. Cerate asked if they would put traps under his trailer to catch some of the wild cats that were in the trailer park, and traps were provided to him as requested. Additionally, parties associated with PETA provided Mr. Cerate with a dog house for two other dogs that were tethered outside of Mr. Cerates home.

On or about October 18 a van that was operated by the ladies associated with PETA arrived the at the trailer park. The van was clearly marked PETA and in broad daylight arrived gathering up what abandoned stray dogs and cats could be gathered. Among the animals gathered was the Chihuahua of Mr. Cerate. Unfortunately the Chihuahua wore no collar, no license, no rabies tag, nothing whatsoever to indicate the dog was other than a stray or abandoned dog. It was not tethered nor was it contained. 

Other animals were also gathered. Individuals living in the trailer park were present and the entire episode was without confrontation. Mr. Cerate was not at home and the dog was loose, sometimes entering the shed/porch or other times outside in the trailer park before he was put in the van and carried from the park. The dogs owned by Mr. Cerate that were tethered were not taken.

Whether one favors or disfavors PETA has little to do with the decision of criminality. The issue is whether there is evidence that the two people when taking the dog believed they were taking the dog of another or whether they were taking an abandoned and/or stray animal. There have been no complaints on the other animals taken on that same day, and, like the Chihuahua, had no collar or tag. From the request of the neighboring livestock owner and the endorsement by the trailer park owner/manager the decision as to the existence of criminal intent beyond a reasonable doubt must be made by the prosecutor. More clearly stated, with the evidence that is available to the Commonwealth, it is just as likely that the two women believed they were gathering abandoned and/or stray animals rather than stealing the property of another. Indeed, it is more probable under this evidence that the two women associated with PETA that day believed they were gathering animals that posed health and/or livestock threat in the trailer park and adjacent community. Without evidence supporting the requisite criminal intent, no criminal prosecution can occur. 

The animals were not euthanized in Accomack County, so this jurisdiction makes no determination on those issues. 

Signed,

Gary R. Agar

Commonwealths Attorneys Office"

Now one has to ask several questions here. Why did the owner restrain his other dogs, bigger dogs, yet let this poor little one run around loose?  No collar, no tags, nothing. Can one say irresponsible owner? And it is what is NOT shown on the video that needs to be questioned. Yet Whiney boy supports this irresponsible owner. 

Then the ultimate reason for all of this - Sam Simon's money. It was announced that Sam Simon, creator of the Simpsons, was dying and leaving his wealth to PeTA. He has been a Board member for years, that makes sense he would do that. Immediately, actually too quickly, after the story of Maya, No Kill Nation is sending a dying man a letter begging him for his money. And basically saying to this man that he was an idiot for following PeTA.

Disgusting, tacky displays of behavior from all of them. Scourge of the humane community, Cooper, Winograd, and No Kill Nation. They are desperate now because their ship is sinking and all the rats are jumping off. More and more people are letting me know they are over No Kill and Winograd. They are. He had really poor attendance for his 'movie', does anyone know of any officials that showed? His boat is dead in the water since his deceitful lies about how many 'communities' are No Kill were exposed.

I'm waiting for the ending because I know it won't be the way Winograd wants it to be.

POOR WITTLE DOUGIE BEGGING FOR REVIEWS FOR HIS WITTLE BOOKS

What's the matter Douglas Anthony Cooper, your 'books' not doing so well? Begging for reviews, how unethical. That's to be expected from the likes of you anyway so nothing new.

Did you try to get back into the USA during Whiney's movie premiers? Just asking. He needed warm or cold bodies, because not many showed. Officials, none unless DD dragged some away with a campaign contribution promise. 

You're a washed up POS, Dougie, face it. Just like Winograd. Save space and bury these two together.

KNOW THY ENEMY, BUT DON'T PARTY WITH THEM

The types that are attracted to No Kill never cease to amaze me. We have, of course, the likes of Best Fiends, or Best Friends, as idiots call them. A cult who figured out they got more money from pimping animals than from passing around the church plate.

http://www.opposingviews.com/i/best-friends-of-utah-the-process-church-of-the-final-judgment-to-animal-society

Now here is Jane Berkey, idol and hero to every pit lover in the country. If you don't know her, here is but some info on this woman.

http://daxtonsfather.wordpress.com/2014/08/16/the-pit-bull-lobby-jane-berkey-animal-farm-foundation-karen-delise-the-national-canine-research-council-indeterminate-breeds/

Seems there are other loves of Ms. Berkey. Warning: May be more than you want to know.

http://cravendesires.blogspot.com/2014/10/the-dark-and-secret-life-of-jane-berkey.html

Credibility. Know thy enemy better than you know thyself. Attack credibility. How many officials want to be linked with the likes of these folks? More tools for the arsenal.

HOW IRRESPONSIBLE IS THE HUFFINGTON POST?? GALILEO DOG ANSWERS.

This month is a recognition month for the misunderstood pit bull breed. Last year the Huffington Post was honoring the Pit Bull Awareness Day with an article showing the wonders of the "nanny" dog and their tiny playmates, kids. 

Included in that stream of photo ops was one picture of a small boy hugging his pit bull, photo #61 of 73 photos, the same pit bull that killed him a month or so later. The Huffington Post ran this picture along with the others until it was brought to their attention. They just took it off, no apologies, nothing to the family, no explanation.

Recently the Huffington Post has given voice to the pit community via Douglas Anthony Cooper.

   

Cooper, a small time novelist from Canada, has condemned one of the two only sources that track disfiguring and fatal dog attacks, Merritt Clifton.

He also attacked another Canadian, Barbara Kay, who speaks so eloquently and knowledgeable about the issue of dangerous dogs. 

It is irresponsible journalism to continue on the path that the Huffington Post is on, which is pimping, yes pimping, pits. Attacks are daily, as of this writing, pit types have killed 25 people in 2014 and countless other animals.

Last Sunday, families were blocked from attending a memorial to the ones killed by dangerous dogs, not just pit bulls, three breeds were represented. Pit bull owners and their pit bulls blocked families from this tribute. 

Is the Huffington Post contributing to this intimidation by having a dedicated "Pit Bull" Huffington Post now?

Recently they presented pits in tutus, a series. When pits are mauling and killing like no other breed in history, is it responsible journalism to support the killers?

"MAD WORLD" by Galileo Dog has answers. "All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them."

BETH CLIFTON: DON'T BULLY MY BREED BUT WE WILL BULLY THE VICTIMS

Taken from: http://www.animals24-7.org/2014/09/30/dont-bully-my-breed-but-we-will-bully-the-victims/#comment-1417

A tribute art memorial entitled “Pay it Forward,” honoring 30 recent victims of fatal dog attacks, was unveiled on September 24, 2014 in Grand Rapids, Michigan by Wyoming,  Michigan resident Joan Kowal as an entry in ArtPrize, an annual outdoor art contest attracting upward of 1,500 entrants and more than 400,000 votes from viewers who select the award-winning entries.

Each victim was portrayed on a cross, along with information about how the person was killed. The killer dogs were identified. About two-thirds were pit bulls, as were 140 of the 216 dogs to have killed Americans since the beginning of 2010.

Displaying thoughtless solidarity, poor social judgment, and some cruelest behavior by fellow humans I have seen short of actual physical violence, pit bull advocates flocked to this sacred memorial, bringing their dogs, to protest that the pit bulls were identified as pit bulls.

Many of the victims were killed by pit bulls from their own households. The information about those pit bulls, including photos of some of them, came from the victims’ grieving families. The pit bull advocates’ protest was simultaneously an exercise in trying to suppress the truth and in disrespecting and bullying the families of the dog attack victims for having shared their painful stories.  The phalanx of demonstrators and pit bulls barely controlled on chains blocked vistors’ view of the information on the crosses for hours.Apart from the sheer nastiness of the demonstrators, their actions illustrate why pit bulls are the dogs most often abused, neglected, and otherwise exploited, to fight and intimidate. This was an act of provocation comparable in rudeness to the Ku Klux Klan repeatedly rallying in the largely Jewish city of Skokie, Illinois, with the difference that Ku Klux Klan members are not notoriously inclined to attack each other and fight to the death without offering even a warning gesture first. These pit bull advocates put their own dogs at risk by bringing them into lunging distance of each other, as well as putting themselves and the public at risk, to try to score propaganda points at a memorial for the recent dead.

This is who is supposedly defending and protecting pit bulls. So long as this sort of behavior characterizes pit bull keepers, pit bulls will continue to be overbred, continue to suffer at the hands of people who claim to love them, and continue to die prematurely after failing repeatedly in homes––and humans, pets, livestock, and wildlife will continue to be victimized by dogs bred for no purpose other than to kill.

Survivors

As a close friend to many survivors of pit bull attacks and surviving family members of some of the dead whom Julie Kowal memorialized, I have witnessed endless egregious acts of cruelty thrown at them by pit bull owners and advocates.  As if it were not horrible enough to experience and deal with all that comes with these attacks, fatal and non-fatal,  emotionally, financially, physically and spiritually, there are some very disturbed pit bull owners who have made an around-the-clock mission of maligning and hurting my friends who have lost children, husbands, wives, sisters, and brothers to pit bulls.Pit bull advocates even distribute false information about victims and survivors to their employers, seeking to get them get them fired from their jobs.

I am not speaking of just a few pathological individuals, but of scores of sociopaths who claim to be defenders of the pit bull, who engage in systematic, organized cyber-stalking and telephone harassment. Many aggressively blame victims and survivors for attacks which typically came either from pit bulls who previously were trusted family members, or pit bulls who rushed out of open doors, leaped out of windows, or jumped fences to attack people who had no idea before that their assailants even existed. Each time the ‘pit bullies’ mystifyingly determine that it is not the dog’s fault that the dog tore off a limb, tongue, or ear of the victim, and allege against the weight of the evidence amassed from more than 5,000 fatal and disfiguring attacks that all dogs do this type of damage.

The self-help networks formed by dog attack survivors and friends have become a very strong united front. Support offered by victims to fellow victims has so far prevented tragic outcomes such as suicide, which often occur in other post-traumatic stress situations where the victims feel alone. But many of the pit bull advocates behind the ceaseless barrage of bullying and personal attacks make clear that they hope for the deaths of victims who speak out, and for the deaths of anyone who amplifies their voices. ANIMALS 24-7, for instance, received this message just last night: “I hope you and your while family contract the Ebola virus!”

As the list of pit bull attack victims grows exponentially, so does the support network.  Survivors around the world are helped to channel their grief, frustration and anger in positive ways to strengthen public awareness.

Meanwhile, as bullying by pit bull advocates escalates, few if any appear to be offering more than platitudes in response to the overbreeding, lack of owner accountability, and increasing frequency of pit bull maulings, which have increased tenfold since the Michael Vick dogfighting case in 2007, more than doubled in 2013 alone, and are close to setting a new record in 2014.

Sociopathic behavior

Just a couple of years ago I too was deeply involved in pit bull rescue and advocacy, as described in “Why pit bulls will break your heart,”  http://www.animals24-7.org/2014/09/10/why-pit-bulls-will-break-your-heart/.  But even in my own fiercest days of pit bull advocacy, when I was transporting, fostering, and speaking on behalf of pit bulls, I would never have dreamed of hurting another human being to defend my dog or any other pit bull.  I also campaigned under my own name.The pit bull fanatics we are dealing with today often conduct their activities anonymously or under false names, like many of the dogfighters and nightriders who produced and perpetuated the breed for decades before most people knew that pit bulls existed.  These people know that attaching their own names to the poison they spew would bring rejection from most of civilized society.

That such individuals form a large part the crowd promoting, defending and protecting pit bulls explains in large part why so little is being accomplished to end the suffering of not only humans, pets, livestock and wildlife victimized by pit bulls, but also of pit bulls themselves.

More surprising, though, than that hostile people who keep hostile dogs behave in a hostile manner is that these are the people with whom much of the humane community elects to make common cause.

Thanks to Beth Clifton for her advocating for pit bull victims. 

THE CRUELTY OF LOW LIFE PIT BULL BULLIES

Low lifers blocking the memorial so families could not come to honor their dead. They made death threats when the Candlelight Vigil for Victims of DANGEROUS DOGS was held. Why is it that only the bullies get pissed off, not owners of the other breeds who have killed. http://www.opposingviews.com/i/society/animal-rights/when-does-walk-victims-become-hate-walk

The lower lifers with pit bulls should realize that this memorial covers all canine fatalities including other breeds who have killed. Where are the bullies for those breeds in this exhibit? Why aren't others out there about their breeds sitting with the low lifer pit bull owners? Because other breed owners aren't bullies, aren't low lifers, they show respect for their breed.

I still say let the police check on those fools for warrants.

http://caninevictimsmemorial.com/index.html