Where's the book, DA? More excuses I see. You mentioned Ian Dunbar, how about some links to prove he helped you. If anything, he advised you to drop it.
And while we are on the subject of your failures to follow through, how about that lawsuit you talk about all the time for San Bernardino? What happened to that? It's been two years now since it was announced. Nothing has happened. In fact, the Grand Jury investigated all the accusations from the No Killers and found nothing. That report was just released. So where do you go from here? Will you just continue to mouth the same bullshit over and over?
Face it Dumb Ass, you are a wash out. You washed out along with your buddy, the Whino, a long time ago.
Friday, July 17, 2015
Wednesday, April 22, 2015
CRYING IN THEIR VEGAN SOUP TODAY, THE CONFEDERATION OF DUNCES ARE LOSERS
Poor little Dougie, Ledy, Pacelle, Whiney. They are all crying in their vegan soup at this point.
They have been stopped in their tracks this year. Very proud to report that during the first quarter of the 2015 legislative season, state preemption bills prohibiting local governments from enacting breed-specific laws were brought in five states
AND IN ALL FIVE STATES THE LEGISLATION FAILED !! -
To put it simply, so far in 2015 Best Fiends has a 0% success rate in passing legislation. Last year, 2014, wasn't much better with only a 33% success rate.
This is without money and that makes it all the more amazing. Grassroots all the way.
Yeah, poor Dougie with all his efforts, if you want to call his uneducated rants an effort, failed to convince people. Guess folks just don't read that rag he writes for.
Tuesday, March 10, 2015
DOUGLAS ANTHONY COOPER, WHERE'S ANY CREDENTIALS?
So let's see what we have here. We have a man (I'm making an assumption) who is from Canada, now living in Mexico, has little lap dogs, and runs with a very young crowd. Did I mention that he is 57 years old? Yet the pictures he uses on all his 'writings' is not that of a 57 year old. Guess he figures can't catch those young groupies with a picture of an old man.
This man writes about pit bulls but where is his credentials for doing so? He doesn't own one and doesn't the pit community insist that you don't know a pit unless you own one?
He claims he isn't a Berman puppet, but he spews every word that Berman spews. Berman now includes him on his sites and the man still wants to claim he isn't on a payroll? Cooper isn't making a living writing Travel and Leisure articles, money has to be coming from elsewhere.
Take a gander of this old man with his 'friend' who is young enough to be his granddaughter. Take a gander at his dogs, narry a pit bull to be seen. Just like with Winograd, they want everyone else to jeopardize their families with a pit bull, but they don't put their money where their mouths are.
Yep, his number is easy to figure out.
Monday, March 9, 2015
DOUGLAS ANTHONY COOPER, HAVE YOU TRIED TO COME BACK INTO THIS COUNTRY YET?
Hey, Dumb Ass, do you really know the company you keep? This is why your name is now on the list of domestic terrorists, guilt by association.
The no kill movement has been around far longer than Nathan Winograd has been on the scene. He comes along and sees an opportunity to be seized, thus is born the "guru" of No Kill. When Winograd left Tompkins County, it was considered fairly sudden. The reason given was family illness. Really? His father in law was indicted for internet fraud at that time. Rumors have long been circulated that Nathan Winograd’s father-in-law Terry Holdt is the money behind Winograd’s various crusades, jihads and holy wars. A little bit of research shows that Holdt has paid the mortgage and property taxes on all of Winograd’s homes since his marriage.
And who is Terry Holdt? Turns out he’s a dot.com type of guy with a long and ugly track record of lawsuits and bankruptcies in his wake. During the 1990s and early 2000s, Mr. Holdt served in various leadership capacities at SONICblue, Inc., an electronics development and manufacturing company, and at S3, Inc., its progenitor. S3 and SONICblue sold consumer electronics that included digital audio players and ReplayTV television technology.
Here are some of his finest moments:
● Ousted CEO called for Holdt’s resignation over insider loans
In Aug. 2002, SONICblue CEO Kenneth Potashner was fired from the company after calling for the resignation of Terry Holdt and two other board members over insider loans. Loans of approximately $177,000 were made from SONICblue to Terry Holdt and the two other board members to purchase stock in RioPort, Inc., a partial subsidiary of SONICblue. Mr. Potashner claimed that the board changed the loans’ terms so that the three board members would be absolved of repaying the loans. Interim CEO L. Gregory Ballard maintained that the loans were all legal and properly disclosed in federal filings. Mr. Holdt dismissed Mr. Potashner’s claims as “bogus.” (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Aug. 10, 2002; San Francisco Gate, Aug. 10, 2002)
In Aug. 2002, SONICblue CEO Kenneth Potashner was fired from the company after calling for the resignation of Terry Holdt and two other board members over insider loans. Loans of approximately $177,000 were made from SONICblue to Terry Holdt and the two other board members to purchase stock in RioPort, Inc., a partial subsidiary of SONICblue. Mr. Potashner claimed that the board changed the loans’ terms so that the three board members would be absolved of repaying the loans. Interim CEO L. Gregory Ballard maintained that the loans were all legal and properly disclosed in federal filings. Mr. Holdt dismissed Mr. Potashner’s claims as “bogus.” (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Aug. 10, 2002; San Francisco Gate, Aug. 10, 2002)
● SONICblue files for bankruptcy protection
In 2003, SONICblue filed for bankruptcy protection amid its ongoing legal battle with the major media companies over its ReplayTV units, and following a loss of $106 million in sales coupled with debts and liabilities in excess of $330 million in 2002. (Forbes, Mar. 24, 2003)
In 2003, SONICblue filed for bankruptcy protection amid its ongoing legal battle with the major media companies over its ReplayTV units, and following a loss of $106 million in sales coupled with debts and liabilities in excess of $330 million in 2002. (Forbes, Mar. 24, 2003)
● Holdt and SONICblue sued for breach, fraud
In 2005, SONICblue bondholders filed a complaint asserting claims for breach of fiduciary duty and constructive fraud in connection with the issuance of bonds in 2002. The plaintiffs claimed that SONICblue and its directors (to include Terry Holdt, named as an individual) “improperly authorized and entered into the financing arrangement while SONICblue was in the zone of insolvency and hopelessly unable to honor its long-term bond obligations.” Following the bondholders’ complaint, SONICblue and its directors removed the complaint to their ongoing bankruptcy case on the basis of having claims for indemnification against the claim. (Case 5:07-cv-03483-
In 2005, SONICblue bondholders filed a complaint asserting claims for breach of fiduciary duty and constructive fraud in connection with the issuance of bonds in 2002. The plaintiffs claimed that SONICblue and its directors (to include Terry Holdt, named as an individual) “improperly authorized and entered into the financing arrangement while SONICblue was in the zone of insolvency and hopelessly unable to honor its long-term bond obligations.” Following the bondholders’ complaint, SONICblue and its directors removed the complaint to their ongoing bankruptcy case on the basis of having claims for indemnification against the claim. (Case 5:07-cv-03483-
Rumor had it that Winograd was promised LA City for his program by the ADL-LA. They were promising, according to rumor, that they would force the Mayor into hiring Winograd. Winograd swears he never wanted the job but he sure wanted that $140,000 consulting gig. This is a chronicle of how the ADL-LA terrorized LA City in the name of No Kill and earned No Kill a place on the domestic terrorist list.
http://articles.latimes.com/2005/sep/08/local/me-animal8
In recent weeks, one neighborhood in the Larchmont Village section of Los Angeles has been under siege: graffiti scrawlings, stink bombs, menacing midnight phone calls and, in July, a bomb scare that forced an evacuation.Police and political leaders say it's a part of an escalation by animal rights activists in Los Angeles, whom critics charge are turning away from legitimate protest and embracing illegal harassment tactics and vandalism.
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/AT-HOME+SECURITY+OK'D+FOR+WORKERS.-a0137868569
Fearing escalating violence by animal-rights activists, the Los Angeles City Council approved a plan Wednesday to provide surveillance equipment at the homes of Animal Services Department employees. The action came as the Animal Defense League announced it plans to demonstrate Saturday in front of Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa's home to protest what it says is his failed promise to hire a new director of Animal Services and push ahead with a no-kill policy at city animal shelters. Aides to the mayor said he respects the activists' right to protest but hopes to meet with them in coming days to work out a mutual policy on how animals should be treated by the city. Councilman Tom LaBonge said his proposal to provide surveillance equipment for the workers was prompted by employees' concerns about possible attacks at their homes. Members of the Animal Liberation Front claimed responsibility for a smoke bomb released recently in the downtown apartment building where Animal Services Director Guerdon Stuckey lives. ``There is a point where it crosses the line,'' LaBonge said. ``We welcome people coming to our council meetings and to protest peacefully. But when it goes beyond that and city workers feel threatened or there is a danger to their families or neighbors, we have to protect our workers.''
http://www.animalliberationfront.com/News/2005_9/StuckeyNotAfraid.htm
The militant underground Animal Liberation Front (ALF) is claiming responsibility for an alleged military-style bombing that occurred at the Bunker Hill Towers Apartments on Figueroa Street, the residence of Los Angeles Animal Services General Manager Guerdon Stuckey.
In a statement on its website dated September 17, the shadowy ALF took credit for the act. The information then appeared in a September 20 e-mail from the unaffiliated, aboveground animal rights group Animal Defense League Los Angeles (ADLLA). The ALF often works by dropping communiqués with legitimate groups. The e-mail stated: "A communiqué received by the Press Office (for the ALF) reads in part: ‘The animal liberation front has taken advice from our Commander in Chief to "smoke terrorists out of their holes." The target was Los Angeles number One terrorist Gordon Stuckey. Military Strength Smoke grenades were detonated on the floor of this animal killers abode. Sleep light … alf."
http://www.oxy.edu/sites/default/files/assets/UEP/Comps/2006/Nasellacomps.pdf
LAAS’s high euthanasia rates has tapped the wrath of animal rights groups such as the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) and the Animal Defense League Los Angeles (ADLLA). These groups have utilized militant protest tactics in recent years to draw attention to the large numbers of animals dying in the city’s shelters. Protestors have also
picketed outside LAAS staff members’ homes. ADLLA was blamed for September gas bombing the former GM Stuckey’s home in 2005. City Council found the situation serious enough to pass a motion allowing for increased security and surveillance in front of animal control workers’ homes. The protests have attracted the attention of the Los Angeles media. The Los Angeles Times, The Daily News, LA Weekly and various local newspapers and news channels devoted regular coverage to the conflict during the height of protesting in 2005.
In the summer of 2004, police had taken nine reports related to animal activists at the home of employees in five months, including five in July alone.xIn June of that year, a LA judge granted a temporary restraining order issued by the city to stop protesters from “assaulting, stalking or following” David Diliberto, a high ranking official of LAAS, during working hours. The judge also prohibited the ADLLA from coming within 100 feet of Dilberto or posting his address or phone number on the internet. Dilberto, had endured a bomb threat by protestors affiliated to ADLLA and ALF. In July, his family was awoken at 3 am by protestors dressed as mortuary workers trying to pick up a body from his home. According to the FBI, ALF and the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) alone are
In recent weeks, one neighborhood in the Larchmont Village section of Los Angeles has been under siege: graffiti scrawlings, stink bombs, menacing midnight phone calls and, in July, a bomb scare that forced an evacuation.Police and political leaders say it's a part of an escalation by animal rights activists in Los Angeles, whom critics charge are turning away from legitimate protest and embracing illegal harassment tactics and vandalism.
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/AT-HOME+SECURITY+OK'D+FOR+WORKERS.-a0137868569
Fearing escalating violence by animal-rights activists, the Los Angeles City Council approved a plan Wednesday to provide surveillance equipment at the homes of Animal Services Department employees. The action came as the Animal Defense League announced it plans to demonstrate Saturday in front of Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa's home to protest what it says is his failed promise to hire a new director of Animal Services and push ahead with a no-kill policy at city animal shelters. Aides to the mayor said he respects the activists' right to protest but hopes to meet with them in coming days to work out a mutual policy on how animals should be treated by the city. Councilman Tom LaBonge said his proposal to provide surveillance equipment for the workers was prompted by employees' concerns about possible attacks at their homes. Members of the Animal Liberation Front claimed responsibility for a smoke bomb released recently in the downtown apartment building where Animal Services Director Guerdon Stuckey lives. ``There is a point where it crosses the line,'' LaBonge said. ``We welcome people coming to our council meetings and to protest peacefully. But when it goes beyond that and city workers feel threatened or there is a danger to their families or neighbors, we have to protect our workers.''
http://www.animalliberationfront.com/News/2005_9/StuckeyNotAfraid.htm
The militant underground Animal Liberation Front (ALF) is claiming responsibility for an alleged military-style bombing that occurred at the Bunker Hill Towers Apartments on Figueroa Street, the residence of Los Angeles Animal Services General Manager Guerdon Stuckey.
In a statement on its website dated September 17, the shadowy ALF took credit for the act. The information then appeared in a September 20 e-mail from the unaffiliated, aboveground animal rights group Animal Defense League Los Angeles (ADLLA). The ALF often works by dropping communiqués with legitimate groups. The e-mail stated: "A communiqué received by the Press Office (for the ALF) reads in part: ‘The animal liberation front has taken advice from our Commander in Chief to "smoke terrorists out of their holes." The target was Los Angeles number One terrorist Gordon Stuckey. Military Strength Smoke grenades were detonated on the floor of this animal killers abode. Sleep light … alf."
http://www.oxy.edu/sites/default/files/assets/UEP/Comps/2006/Nasellacomps.pdf
LAAS’s high euthanasia rates has tapped the wrath of animal rights groups such as the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) and the Animal Defense League Los Angeles (ADLLA). These groups have utilized militant protest tactics in recent years to draw attention to the large numbers of animals dying in the city’s shelters. Protestors have also
picketed outside LAAS staff members’ homes. ADLLA was blamed for September gas bombing the former GM Stuckey’s home in 2005. City Council found the situation serious enough to pass a motion allowing for increased security and surveillance in front of animal control workers’ homes. The protests have attracted the attention of the Los Angeles media. The Los Angeles Times, The Daily News, LA Weekly and various local newspapers and news channels devoted regular coverage to the conflict during the height of protesting in 2005.
In the summer of 2004, police had taken nine reports related to animal activists at the home of employees in five months, including five in July alone.xIn June of that year, a LA judge granted a temporary restraining order issued by the city to stop protesters from “assaulting, stalking or following” David Diliberto, a high ranking official of LAAS, during working hours. The judge also prohibited the ADLLA from coming within 100 feet of Dilberto or posting his address or phone number on the internet. Dilberto, had endured a bomb threat by protestors affiliated to ADLLA and ALF. In July, his family was awoken at 3 am by protestors dressed as mortuary workers trying to pick up a body from his home. According to the FBI, ALF and the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) alone are
responsible for more than 600 criminal acts in the United States since 1996, causing
damages in excess of $43 milliondollars. While their actions have not yet taken
human life, federal and state lawmakers are proposing legislation to give more muscle to
law enforcement efforts against those committing violent acts in the name of animal
rights or the environment. ALF is listed as one of the U.S. Department of Justice’s
domestic terror organizations.
While the ADLLA claims not to know the identity of ALF members, both groups are part of the recently formed NortH American Animal Liberation Press Office. The office received communiqués from anonymous sources to publicize actions made by animal rights groups. It also opens up lines of communications between animal rights groups.
A search on the Animal Liberation Front website for Nathan Winograd yields 77 results.
http://www.google.com/cse?cx=017172558093609496370%3Agomu6nootcm&q=Nathan+Winograd&sa=Search&cof=FORID%3A0&siteurl=www.animalliberationfront.com%2Fsearch.htm&ref=www.animalliberationfront.com%2FALFront%2FActions-USA%2FLAAS-Barnette.htm&ss=2782j680298j17#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=Nathan%20Winograd&gsc.page=1
Winograd was questioned by Patricia Ruland of the Austin Chronicle about his association with these radical groups, why he doesn't dis-associate himself with them. This was his answer. http://www.austinchronicle.com/news/2008-10-31/696455/
After the forum, during a brief interview amplifying his prepared remarks, I also asked Winograd whether he welcomed the support of radical animal rights groups that have committed (or taken credit for) violent actions, in what they describe online as support for Winograd's No Kill programs (for example, www.animalliberationfront.com/News/2007_12/LindyLAMagInterview.htm). Winograd answered that question and others but later responded by enlisting a local attorney to denounce the question as inflammatory and to suggest that further questions would be subject to legal review. On his blog the day following his talk, Winograd blasted this yet-to-be writtenChronicle story: "Despite the support and enthusiasm of the crowd, and the promise that a focus on the No Kill Equation would mean for the homeless animals of Austin, there was one hostile attendee: a reporter who lashed out at me for questioning the city's effort and those of the shelter and posed questions of an inflammatory and defamatory nature. No effort was made to simply report the news; investigate fairly; or pretend to be professional and lack bias." (Seewww.nathanwinograd.blogspot.com.) The audio recording of our brief conversation reflects nothing of the kind, only questions asked and answered. Winograd said that he was not affiliated with such violent groups and, as a former prosecutor, believes in pressing charges if such illegal acts had occurred. (WHY DOESN'T HE JUST COME RIGHT OUT AND SAY HE WANTS NO PART OF THEM? WHY DOESN'T HE CONDEMN THEM OPENLY?)
In Florida, certain radical entities have been solicited by No Kill Nation against certain people who are speaking against NKN. Note above about the role of ALF in Los Angeles. In the past few months, No Kill Nation filed a lawsuit against Randy DeCarlo. Randy had a rescue, the Miami/Dade Rescue Railroad, and had saved hundreds of pets. Randy also has his home as a sanctuary for older hounds, hounds that required 24-hour a day care. And Randy himself is a victim of Crohns Disease. That is a long and complicated story but it is ending up with a threat of jail for Randy. The stress has made his health worse.
No Kill Nation has gone so far as to establish a "legal" fund to fight people such as Randy. It is called an "Awareness" fund but the spirit of that fund is to intimidate, to hurt good people who have dedicated their lives to saving lives. Is this the action of a truly humane group, to hurt a disabled man who is providing sanctuary, and a darn good one to boot, to old hounds?
Screen shots have been made of threats to Randy and others by those involved with No Kill Nation, as well as the founder of No Kill Nation. Now there are police reports and an FBI case number. Is this stopping No Kill Nation? No, the anger is escalating. A press release last week by Nathan Winograd announced that No Kill is an animal rights movement, and that puts it in league with the likes of ALF/Shac.
Screen shots show No Kill Nation speaking with two known radical groups, one of which is the ALF. If you note above the role of ALF in Los Angeles, this throws a different light onto what is happening. Another group was contacted in regards to hacking internet accounts and several people did experience being hacked afterwards. Is No Kill Nation giving ALF the red light to come into Florida and do what was done in LA?
Ingrid NewKirk of PeTA pointed to an infamous cyberbully who follows No Kill Nation per many screen shots available. This particular cyberbully paints herself, or rather many of herselves, as the victim/victims when it is she who is victimizing people with the full knowledge and approval of No Kill Nation.
"but hide, as bullies do, behind the anonymity of made-up names, such as that of a Peanuts cartoon character who posted 375 anti-PETA comments over a period of two weeks."
Tuesday, March 3, 2015
WHERE IN THE WORLD IS GALUNKER?
Fanfare, trumpets, red carpet, Pulitzer prize were the dreams of the washed out author turned pit nutter, Douglas Anthony Cooper for his book, Galunker.
So what has happened? He only needed $27,000 and collected over $62,000, still no book?
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/590151478/galunker/posts/1067162
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/590151478/galunker/posts/1067162
The only explanation offered is "We're sorry to say that it does look as if the book will be a bit late, ". A bit late? Looks like to me that he's taking his time up responding to all the criticism. "We received all sorts of responses from Team Galunker during and after the launch of the Kickstarter campaign, and we’ve been incorporating your ideas and addressing your criticism." We know pit nutters only have one idea so that can't be the reason, their idea is 'education'. Too bad nutters don't have one, especially when they continue to use 'bread' for 'breed'. Then again, Cooper doesn't want the educational level too high, he would have no readers.
This fool thinks he is writing a book to help children from being mauled to death by the world's number one canine killer, the pit bull. Has he lost his mind completely, or did he ever have one to being with? ""another major goal with this book is to provide parents with a guide to how to keep their children safe around dogs. (ANY dog – breed is irrelevant.)""
Strange that Cooper is such good buddies with Nathie Winograd, who owns his own publishing house, and the book hasn't been published yet. Nathie couldn't get a reputable publishing house to touch his biased bullshit either, so he had to do it himself. What's the matter, Nathie, don't want your buddy to compete with you? C'mon publish the book for Dumb Ass.
And Shades of Karen Delise, the excuse is that war broke out in Israel and that makes the book late. Just when you thought you had heard them all.
Wednesday, February 11, 2015
THE INTERVIEW WITH THE COWARD HIDING IN HONDURAS VIA DUMB ASS COOPER
That vile little man and his puppet are at it again. Sock puppet, Douglas Anthony Cooper, ended up with an 'interview' as if that makes his fiction writing credible.
Cooper, where did you go to the school of politics - Canada? You write a piece about legislation in Virginia with the headlines that this bill will "Stop It (PeTA) From Slaughtering More Pets". That made for a good laugh. Did you even read the bill before you wrote about, have you read it since you wrote about it?
These No Kill Fools are already posting this initiative as a victory, but the reality is that PeTA never claimed to be a shelter to begin with. That's the catch. This is in their favor. Since they will no longer be considered a shelter, then they won't have to report their numbers to the State. Is that the victory you wanted Whino? Of course you have to come riding in on your white horse after the fact trying to claim credit. Typical.
And bringing up the rear, appropriate observation I think, is that Dumb Ass Cooper, trying to scoop up the crumbs of Winograd's cookies. His 'interview' was really a hoot to read and I would like to point out the more laughable areas.
First of all, this woman is the lowest of the low because she waited 15 years to report this alleged cruelty she supposedly witnessed. I mean, c'mon, give me a break. Cooper calls her "an exceptionally brave woman" and I call her a coward.
Winograd has always made claims of him seeing cruelty in shelters, he makes pictures (supposedly) of it. BUT he fails to report it at the time to make it stop. He walks away from that cruelty and takes about it later. He did nothing to stop it, no reporting of it, nothing. He blogs about it but when called on the carpet about why he failed to report it at the time, he has no answer. Coward. If you see cruelty and walk away like that, Winograd, it makes you more guilty of the cruelty than the perpetrator, just like this woman.
Cooper notes the statute of limitations, very important here. Fifteen years, too late to call witnesses to dispute these accusations, too late to obtain proof, and Cooper knows that. I dare say there would be no interview if this happened last week when witnesses could be had and proof given to dispute what this coward has to say.
I will venture to say that this coward is eat up with guilt because she probably did the very things she is accusing others of doing. I would like to say that but personally, this is a set up. Winograd has pulled this tactic before, more than once. Suddenly these people just show up out of the blue at the last moment with exactly what Winograd needs to overcome objections. The fact that it was so long ago prevents rebuttal.
Winograd is hoping to prove the accusations against PeTA and the Maya story with this coward's blog. I will guarantee you that when that story of Maya ends, Nathan Winograd and his crowd will be at the root, a set up. I firmly believe they had something to do with it.
This is what the Attorney General of Virginia had to say about the situation. It plainly shows how badly Cooper and the Whino distort the truth.
Now one has to ask several questions here. Why did the owner restrain his other dogs, bigger dogs, yet let this poor little one run around loose? No collar, no tags, nothing. Can one say irresponsible owner? And it is what is NOT shown on the video that needs to be questioned. Yet Whiney boy supports this irresponsible owner.
Then the ultimate reason for all of this - Sam Simon's money. It was announced that Sam Simon, creator of the Simpsons, was dying and leaving his wealth to PeTA. He has been a Board member for years, that makes sense he would do that. Immediately, actually too quickly, after the story of Maya, No Kill Nation is sending a dying man a letter begging him for his money. And basically saying to this man that he was an idiot for following PeTA.
Disgusting, tacky displays of behavior from all of them. Scourge of the humane community, Cooper, Winograd, and No Kill Nation. They are desperate now because their ship is sinking and all the rats are jumping off. More and more people are letting me know they are over No Kill and Winograd. They are. He had really poor attendance for his 'movie', does anyone know of any officials that showed? His boat is dead in the water since his deceitful lies about how many 'communities' are No Kill were exposed.
I'm waiting for the ending because I know it won't be the way Winograd wants it to be.
Cooper, where did you go to the school of politics - Canada? You write a piece about legislation in Virginia with the headlines that this bill will "Stop It (PeTA) From Slaughtering More Pets". That made for a good laugh. Did you even read the bill before you wrote about, have you read it since you wrote about it?
These No Kill Fools are already posting this initiative as a victory, but the reality is that PeTA never claimed to be a shelter to begin with. That's the catch. This is in their favor. Since they will no longer be considered a shelter, then they won't have to report their numbers to the State. Is that the victory you wanted Whino? Of course you have to come riding in on your white horse after the fact trying to claim credit. Typical.
And bringing up the rear, appropriate observation I think, is that Dumb Ass Cooper, trying to scoop up the crumbs of Winograd's cookies. His 'interview' was really a hoot to read and I would like to point out the more laughable areas.
First of all, this woman is the lowest of the low because she waited 15 years to report this alleged cruelty she supposedly witnessed. I mean, c'mon, give me a break. Cooper calls her "an exceptionally brave woman" and I call her a coward.
Winograd has always made claims of him seeing cruelty in shelters, he makes pictures (supposedly) of it. BUT he fails to report it at the time to make it stop. He walks away from that cruelty and takes about it later. He did nothing to stop it, no reporting of it, nothing. He blogs about it but when called on the carpet about why he failed to report it at the time, he has no answer. Coward. If you see cruelty and walk away like that, Winograd, it makes you more guilty of the cruelty than the perpetrator, just like this woman.
Cooper notes the statute of limitations, very important here. Fifteen years, too late to call witnesses to dispute these accusations, too late to obtain proof, and Cooper knows that. I dare say there would be no interview if this happened last week when witnesses could be had and proof given to dispute what this coward has to say.
I will venture to say that this coward is eat up with guilt because she probably did the very things she is accusing others of doing. I would like to say that but personally, this is a set up. Winograd has pulled this tactic before, more than once. Suddenly these people just show up out of the blue at the last moment with exactly what Winograd needs to overcome objections. The fact that it was so long ago prevents rebuttal.
Winograd is hoping to prove the accusations against PeTA and the Maya story with this coward's blog. I will guarantee you that when that story of Maya ends, Nathan Winograd and his crowd will be at the root, a set up. I firmly believe they had something to do with it.
This is what the Attorney General of Virginia had to say about the situation. It plainly shows how badly Cooper and the Whino distort the truth.
"Commonwealths Attorneys cannot always make popular decisions, rather they are charged with making responsible decisions. Prosecutors must decide if evidence gathered provides proof beyond a reasonable doubt each element of the criminal offense. The criminal intent required to convict someone for theft or property (or dog) it must be shown that the defendant intended to steal the property (or dog) it must be shown that the taking was coupled with the intent of depriving the rightful owner of their property.
The facts appear be that PETA was asked to help when an adjacent landowner reported that they should see how his cow with her udders ripped up from abandoned and stray dogs in the trailer park area amounted to a menace not to be tolerated. He complained to PETA that the abandoned and stray dogs attacked his livestock, injured his milking cow, killed his goat and terrorized his rabbits.
Abandoned and/or stray dogs and cats have appeared to have been considerable in what is known as Dreamland 2. PETA responded and the trailer park management encouraged their efforts in an attempt to gather stray/abandoned cats and dogs. Additionally the leases provided that no dogs were allowed to run free in the trailer park.
Approximately three weeks before Mr. Cerates dog was taken by the women associated with PETA, Mr. Cerate asked if they would put traps under his trailer to catch some of the wild cats that were in the trailer park, and traps were provided to him as requested. Additionally, parties associated with PETA provided Mr. Cerate with a dog house for two other dogs that were tethered outside of Mr. Cerates home.
On or about October 18 a van that was operated by the ladies associated with PETA arrived the at the trailer park. The van was clearly marked PETA and in broad daylight arrived gathering up what abandoned stray dogs and cats could be gathered. Among the animals gathered was the Chihuahua of Mr. Cerate. Unfortunately the Chihuahua wore no collar, no license, no rabies tag, nothing whatsoever to indicate the dog was other than a stray or abandoned dog. It was not tethered nor was it contained.
Other animals were also gathered. Individuals living in the trailer park were present and the entire episode was without confrontation. Mr. Cerate was not at home and the dog was loose, sometimes entering the shed/porch or other times outside in the trailer park before he was put in the van and carried from the park. The dogs owned by Mr. Cerate that were tethered were not taken.
Whether one favors or disfavors PETA has little to do with the decision of criminality. The issue is whether there is evidence that the two people when taking the dog believed they were taking the dog of another or whether they were taking an abandoned and/or stray animal. There have been no complaints on the other animals taken on that same day, and, like the Chihuahua, had no collar or tag. From the request of the neighboring livestock owner and the endorsement by the trailer park owner/manager the decision as to the existence of criminal intent beyond a reasonable doubt must be made by the prosecutor. More clearly stated, with the evidence that is available to the Commonwealth, it is just as likely that the two women believed they were gathering abandoned and/or stray animals rather than stealing the property of another. Indeed, it is more probable under this evidence that the two women associated with PETA that day believed they were gathering animals that posed health and/or livestock threat in the trailer park and adjacent community. Without evidence supporting the requisite criminal intent, no criminal prosecution can occur.
The animals were not euthanized in Accomack County, so this jurisdiction makes no determination on those issues.
Signed,
Gary R. Agar
Commonwealths Attorneys Office"
Now one has to ask several questions here. Why did the owner restrain his other dogs, bigger dogs, yet let this poor little one run around loose? No collar, no tags, nothing. Can one say irresponsible owner? And it is what is NOT shown on the video that needs to be questioned. Yet Whiney boy supports this irresponsible owner.
Then the ultimate reason for all of this - Sam Simon's money. It was announced that Sam Simon, creator of the Simpsons, was dying and leaving his wealth to PeTA. He has been a Board member for years, that makes sense he would do that. Immediately, actually too quickly, after the story of Maya, No Kill Nation is sending a dying man a letter begging him for his money. And basically saying to this man that he was an idiot for following PeTA.
Disgusting, tacky displays of behavior from all of them. Scourge of the humane community, Cooper, Winograd, and No Kill Nation. They are desperate now because their ship is sinking and all the rats are jumping off. More and more people are letting me know they are over No Kill and Winograd. They are. He had really poor attendance for his 'movie', does anyone know of any officials that showed? His boat is dead in the water since his deceitful lies about how many 'communities' are No Kill were exposed.
I'm waiting for the ending because I know it won't be the way Winograd wants it to be.
Wednesday, February 4, 2015
POOR WITTLE DOUGIE BEGGING FOR REVIEWS FOR HIS WITTLE BOOKS
What's the matter Douglas Anthony Cooper, your 'books' not doing so well? Begging for reviews, how unethical. That's to be expected from the likes of you anyway so nothing new.
Did you try to get back into the USA during Whiney's movie premiers? Just asking. He needed warm or cold bodies, because not many showed. Officials, none unless DD dragged some away with a campaign contribution promise.
You're a washed up POS, Dougie, face it. Just like Winograd. Save space and bury these two together.
Did you try to get back into the USA during Whiney's movie premiers? Just asking. He needed warm or cold bodies, because not many showed. Officials, none unless DD dragged some away with a campaign contribution promise.
You're a washed up POS, Dougie, face it. Just like Winograd. Save space and bury these two together.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)